Prediction of Erika De Lone vs Pamela Jung Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. De Lone vs P. Jung

Erika De Lone

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.70m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

215

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Pamela Jung

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.70m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

215

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Head-to-head: Lone 1 - 0 Jung

They have played 4 sets in total, with Erika De Lone winning 4 and Pamela Jung winning 0. The last match between Erika De Lone and Pamela Jung was at the Unknown Tournament, 20-03-1989, Round: Q1, Surface: N/A, with Erika De Lone getting the victory 6-3 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Lone	1
Jung	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Unknown Tournament(03-20-89)

Stats

Erika De Lone

Pamela Jung

(R3) ITF Midland(02-06-89)

Stats

Erika De Lone

Pamela Jung

E. D. Lone vs P. Jung H2H Profile

E. D. Lone	Stats	P. Jung
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.39% (252-229)	Career Total W/L	38.28% (49-79)
1	Hard	0
4	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. D. Lone vs P. Jung Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Erika De Lone has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pamela Jung has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Erika De Lone, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pamela Jung has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Erika De Lone has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pamela Jung has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Erika De Lone has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pamela Jung winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Erika De Lone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 13/9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 14/18). Pamela Jung has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 35% (W/L 7/13).
Player level: In the last year, Erika De Lone has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pamela Jung has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Erika De Lone winning 2 times and Pamela Jung being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Erika De Lone winning 4 and Pamela Jung winning 0.
The last match between Erika De Lone and Pamela Jung was at the Unknown Tournament, 20-03-1989, Round: Q1, Surface: N/A, with Erika De Lone getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Erika De Lone has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pamela Jung has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Erika De Lone has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pamela Jung has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Erika De Lone has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pamela Jung has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Erika De Lone vs Pamela Jung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. D. Lone vs P. Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. D. Lone	Stats	P. Jung
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
25	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

E. D. Lone Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Vancouver - 07-07-2003
R2 Verena BellerV. Beller	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Ayami TakaseA. Takase	W	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 26-08-2002
Q1 Claudine SchaulC. Schaul	W	0-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Q2 Iveta BenesovaI. Benesova	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Pilot Pen Tennis - New Haven, Connecticut - 19-08-2002
Q1 Elena LikhovtsevaE. Likhovtseva	W	7-6(8) 2-6 7-6(9)	Stats

View All

P. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF New Braunfels - 21-01-1991
R3 Katrina AdamsK. Adams	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
ITF Mission - 14-01-1991
R3 Joannette KrugerJ. Kruger	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
ITF Midland 1 - 07-01-1991
R3 Nicole StrnadovaN. Strnadova	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
ITF Ramat Hasharon 1 - 19-03-1990
Robyn FieldR. Field	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
R4 Sandrine BregnardS. Bregnard	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

E. D. Lone vs P. Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. D. Lone	Stats	P. Jung
52.39% (252/229)	YTD Win/Loss	38.28% (49/79)
52.17% (589/540)	Sets Win/Loss	40.14% (116/173)
50.86% (5247/5070)	Games Win/Loss	47.31% (1241/1382)
53.15% (152/134)	Hard Win/Loss	39.74% (31/47)
51.95% (40/37)	Clay Win/Loss	38.10% (8/13)
53.70% (29/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	28.57% (2/5)
43.75% (14/18)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
389.94	Average Opponent Rank	423.53
38.10% (16/26)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
28.57% (4/10)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
45.12% (37/45)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
70.00% (63/27)	Challenger W/L	45.71% (32/38)
53.13% (17/15)	Futures W/L	36.36% (4/7)
52% (249/477)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	38% (49/128)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
51% (36/70)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (3/6)
47% (81/171)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (15/33)
81% (263/212)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (50/41)
19% (263/51)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (50/9)
17% (216/37)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (78/8)